PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CWIN.TO achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than HBA.TO's 0.36% return.


CWIN.TO

1D
0.05%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
7.09%
6M
12.26%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HBA.TO

1D
-0.07%
1M
-8.86%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.66%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
13.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison


Return for Risk

CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CWIN.TO
CWIN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CWIN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CWIN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HBA.TO
HBA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HBA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
HBA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CWIN.TOHBA.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

1.00

+1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

1.42

+1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.19

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

1.85

+1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.03

4.60

+9.43

CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CWIN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the HBA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CWIN.TO and HBA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CWIN.TOHBA.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

1.00

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.02

1.01

+1.01

Correlation

The correlation between CWIN.TO and HBA.TO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO - Dividend Comparison

CWIN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, which matches HBA.TO's 3.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
CWIN.TO
HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units
3.04%3.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HBA.TO
Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF
3.07%4.11%4.45%6.67%8.56%5.81%2.66%

Drawdowns

CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CWIN.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum HBA.TO drawdown of -21.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CWIN.TO and HBA.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CWIN.TOHBA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.87%

-21.15%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-10.17%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.01%

-10.17%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-4.46%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

4.08%

-1.77%

Volatility

CWIN.TO vs. HBA.TO - Volatility Comparison

HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Enhanced Canadian Dividend ETF Class E Units (CWIN.TO) and Hamilton Australian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HBA.TO) have volatilities of 4.75% and 4.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CWIN.TOHBA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

4.78%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

12.95%

-3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

18.91%

-4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.17%

17.59%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

18.17%

-4.00%