CSY8.DE vs. CSY9.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE).
CSY8.DE and CSY9.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSY8.DE is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders. It was launched on Jun 29, 2020. CSY9.DE is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. It was launched on Jul 24, 2020. Both CSY8.DE and CSY9.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CSY8.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSY8.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSY8.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 3.07% | -2.70% | 13.60% | 12.50% | -11.53% | 31.40% | 24.91% |
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | -0.42% | -0.67% | 16.05% | 5.76% | -5.25% | 23.30% | 2.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSY8.DE achieves a 3.07% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's -0.42% return.
CSY8.DE
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.83%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 12.96%
- 3Y*
- 8.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- —
CSY9.DE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- -2.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSY8.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSY8.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CSY8.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CSY8.DE
CSY9.DE
CSY8.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSY8.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | -0.19 | +0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | -0.18 | +1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.97 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | -0.03 | +3.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.97 | -0.05 | +8.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSY8.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | -0.19 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.47 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSY8.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CSY8.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSY8.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CSY8.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSY8.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSY8.DE and CSY9.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSY8.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.41% | -13.92% | -17.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -8.45% | -1.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.41% | -13.92% | -17.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.85% | -6.12% | -1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -3.66% | -4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.74% | -0.10% |
Volatility
CSY8.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison
CSIF (IE) MSCI USA Small Cap ESG Leaders Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY8.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.94%. This indicates that CSY8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSY8.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 2.94% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 5.80% | +5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 11.51% | +10.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 12.06% | +8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 12.02% | +8.42% |