CSP1.L vs. I500.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L).
CSP1.L and I500.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CSP1.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. I500.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Net Dividends Reinvested Index (Net USD). It was launched on Sep 26, 2024. Both CSP1.L and I500.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CSP1.L vs. I500.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CSP1.L vs. I500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | -3.08% | 9.37% | 27.35% | 19.79% | -9.05% | 31.07% | 5.62% |
I500.L iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF | -3.06% | 9.56% | 27.57% | 20.04% | -8.74% | 31.23% | 5.72% |
Different Trading Currencies
CSP1.L is traded in GBp, while I500.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the I500.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSP1.L having a -3.08% return and I500.L slightly higher at -3.06%.
CSP1.L
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -3.08%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 14.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.63%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
I500.L
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.29%
- YTD
- -3.06%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CSP1.L vs. I500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CSP1.L and I500.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CSP1.L vs. I500.L — Risk / Return Rank
CSP1.L
I500.L
CSP1.L vs. I500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSP1.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.00 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 1.44 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.09 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 7.28 | -0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSP1.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.00 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.90 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.97 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between CSP1.L and I500.L is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CSP1.L vs. I500.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CSP1.L nor I500.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CSP1.L vs. I500.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSP1.L drawdown since its inception was -25.48%, which is greater than I500.L's maximum drawdown of -20.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSP1.L and I500.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSP1.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.48% | -20.75% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | -10.30% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -20.75% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -4.70% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.35% | -3.43% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.04% | +0.03% |
Volatility
CSP1.L vs. I500.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) and iShares S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF (I500.L) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CSP1.L | I500.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 3.77% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.30% | 8.20% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.14% | 14.96% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 14.28% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 14.42% | +1.18% |