PortfoliosLab logo
CSL vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CSL and XLF is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

CSL vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2,406.75%
469.13%
CSL
XLF

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CSL:

0.13

XLF:

0.99

Sortino Ratio

CSL:

0.39

XLF:

1.45

Omega Ratio

CSL:

1.05

XLF:

1.21

Calmar Ratio

CSL:

0.12

XLF:

1.28

Martin Ratio

CSL:

0.25

XLF:

5.09

Ulcer Index

CSL:

15.92%

XLF:

3.91%

Daily Std Dev

CSL:

31.33%

XLF:

20.14%

Max Drawdown

CSL:

-64.58%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

CSL:

-20.30%

XLF:

-7.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSL achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 0.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CSL has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 16.01%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 13.98% annualized return.


CSL

YTD

3.69%

1M

9.23%

6M

-16.42%

1Y

2.60%

5Y*

28.01%

10Y*

16.01%

XLF

YTD

0.20%

1M

-4.32%

6M

3.14%

1Y

19.17%

5Y*

19.57%

10Y*

13.98%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CSL vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSL is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSL is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSL is 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSL is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSL is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSL is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CSL vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CSL, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CSL: 0.13
XLF: 0.99
The chart of Sortino ratio for CSL, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CSL: 0.39
XLF: 1.45
The chart of Omega ratio for CSL, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CSL: 1.05
XLF: 1.21
The chart of Calmar ratio for CSL, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CSL: 0.12
XLF: 1.28
The chart of Martin ratio for CSL, currently valued at 0.25, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CSL: 0.25
XLF: 5.09

The current CSL Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSL and XLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.13
0.99
CSL
XLF

Dividends

CSL vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

CSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than XLF's 1.48% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
1.01%1.00%1.02%1.09%0.86%1.31%1.11%1.53%1.27%1.18%1.24%1.04%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.48%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%

Drawdowns

CSL vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSL drawdown since its inception was -64.58%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSL and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-20.30%
-7.21%
CSL
XLF

Volatility

CSL vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) have volatilities of 13.66% and 13.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.66%
13.51%
CSL
XLF