CRAK vs. ION
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION).
CRAK and ION are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CRAK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Oil Refiners. It was launched on Aug 18, 2015. ION is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Nov 29, 2022. Both CRAK and ION are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CRAK vs. ION - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRAK vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 31.71% | 39.11% | -15.05% | 13.73% | -3.77% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 9.49% | 108.37% | -20.02% | -14.10% | -8.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRAK achieves a 31.71% return, which is significantly higher than ION's 9.49% return.
CRAK
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 10.12%
- YTD
- 31.71%
- 6M
- 37.36%
- 1Y
- 75.35%
- 3Y*
- 20.21%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
ION
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 46.23%
- 1Y
- 124.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRAK vs. ION - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRAK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ION's 0.58% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CRAK vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank
CRAK
ION
CRAK vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRAK | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.63 | 3.21 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.38 | 3.47 | +0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.47 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 5.26 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.23 | 20.19 | +1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRAK | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.63 | 3.21 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.37 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRAK and ION is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CRAK vs. ION - Dividend Comparison
CRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than ION's 1.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRAK VanEck Oil Refiners ETF | 1.53% | 2.02% | 5.60% | 3.65% | 3.08% | 2.40% | 2.64% | 1.49% | 2.42% | 1.66% | 3.42% | 0.47% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CRAK vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRAK drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, which is greater than ION's maximum drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRAK and ION.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRAK | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.80% | -52.08% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.07% | -23.30% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -13.04% | +13.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.64% | -24.61% | +11.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 6.07% | -2.58% |
Volatility
CRAK vs. ION - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) is 5.52%, while Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) has a volatility of 15.13%. This indicates that CRAK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ION based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRAK | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 15.13% | -9.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 30.44% | -16.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | 39.07% | -18.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.44% | 30.74% | -10.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 30.74% | -8.64% |