PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Polygon Staked ETP (CPYG.DE) and VanEck Ethereum ETN (VETH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CPYG.DE
CoinShares Physical Polygon Staked ETP
-8.76%-79.89%-49.31%33.78%72.29%
VETH.DE
VanEck Ethereum ETN
-27.59%-21.95%52.69%89.80%0.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPYG.DE achieves a -8.76% return, which is significantly higher than VETH.DE's -27.59% return.


CPYG.DE

1D
3.06%
1M
-10.10%
YTD
-8.76%
6M
-59.49%
1Y
-56.71%
3Y*
-55.99%
5Y*
10Y*

VETH.DE

1D
2.74%
1M
4.80%
YTD
-27.59%
6M
-50.37%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPYG.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VETH.DE's 1.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPYG.DE
CPYG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CPYG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPYG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPYG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
CPYG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPYG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

VETH.DE
VETH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VETH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VETH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VETH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
VETH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VETH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Polygon Staked ETP (CPYG.DE) and VanEck Ethereum ETN (VETH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPYG.DEVETH.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.77

0.06

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.16

0.57

-1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.06

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

0.08

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.38

0.16

-1.54

CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPYG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the VETH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPYG.DE and VETH.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPYG.DEVETH.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

0.06

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.02

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between CPYG.DE and VETH.DE is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPYG.DE nor VETH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPYG.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.07%, which is greater than VETH.DE's maximum drawdown of -76.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPYG.DE and VETH.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CPYG.DEVETH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.07%

-76.77%

-17.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.16%

-60.97%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.62%

-56.89%

-36.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.96%

-43.30%

-12.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.95%

29.25%

+10.70%

Volatility

CPYG.DE vs. VETH.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Polygon Staked ETP (CPYG.DE) is 14.78%, while VanEck Ethereum ETN (VETH.DE) has a volatility of 17.90%. This indicates that CPYG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VETH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CPYG.DEVETH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.78%

17.90%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.09%

45.64%

+5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.41%

65.49%

+7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

83.48%

71.88%

+11.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.48%

72.20%

+11.28%