CPSL vs. EAPR

Last updated Apr 14, 2026

CPSL (Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. CPSL is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, CPSL returned 9.02% vs 23.36% for EAPR. At 0.44, their price movements are largely independent. CPSL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.

Performance

CPSL vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSL achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 7.65% return.

CPSL

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 2.46%
• 1Y: 9.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAPR

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 6.46%
• YTD: 7.65%
• 6M: 10.17%
• 1Y: 23.36%
• 3Y*: 9.37%
• 5Y*: 4.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSL vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CPSL Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF	1.27%	6.43%	2.32%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	7.65%	14.80%	0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CPSL and EAPR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024	0.44

Return for Risk

CPSL vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSL

CPSL Risk / Return Rank: 93
CPSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
CPSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CPSL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CPSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
CPSL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSL vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CPSL	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	3.81	-0.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.31	7.59	-2.27
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.68	2.14	-0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.59	18.56	-11.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	32.84	75.39	-42.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CPSL vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSL Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSL and EAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CPSL	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.19	3.81	-0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.85	0.49	+1.35

Drawdowns

CPSL vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSL drawdown since its inception was -3.72%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSL and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CPSL	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.72%	-17.65%	+13.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.34%	-1.42%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-4.16%	+3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.27%	0.35%	-0.08%

Volatility

CPSL vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Laddered S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF (CPSL) is 1.13%, while Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that CPSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CPSL	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	4.08%	-2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.70%	4.53%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86%	6.22%	-3.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.47%	9.96%	-6.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.47%	9.95%	-6.48%

CPSL vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

CPSL vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CPSL nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments