PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CPSA vs. DMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CPSA vs. DMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CPSA achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly higher than DMAX's -0.13% return.


CPSA

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.27%
6M
1.27%
1Y
11.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMAX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
1.81%
1Y
9.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CPSA vs. DMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CPSA and DMAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.


CPSA vs. DMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CPSA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CPSA vs. DMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CPSA
CPSA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CPSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSA Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DMAX
DMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CPSA vs. DMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CPSADMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.79

3.12

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.10

5.28

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.73

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

5.46

-1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.00

23.85

-2.86

CPSA vs. DMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CPSA Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the DMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CPSA and DMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CPSADMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

3.12

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.58

1.73

-0.15

Drawdowns

CPSA vs. DMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CPSA drawdown since its inception was -4.72%, which is greater than DMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CPSA and DMAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CPSADMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-3.37%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.99%

-1.41%

-0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.73%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-0.43%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.32%

+0.06%

Volatility

CPSA vs. DMAX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - August (CPSA) has a higher volatility of 1.15% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer December ETF (DMAX) at 0.99%. This indicates that CPSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CPSADMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

0.99%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

1.81%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.06%

3.17%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.28%

3.55%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.28%

3.55%

+0.73%

Dividends

CPSA vs. DMAX - Dividend Comparison

CPSA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.