COWG vs. GSLC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L).
COWG and GSLC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COWG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022. GSLC.L is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 TR USD. It was launched on Sep 23, 2019. Both COWG and GSLC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COWG vs. GSLC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COWG vs. GSLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | -3.92% | 10.24% | 34.99% | 20.69% | -0.68% |
GSLC.L Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | -5.34% | 16.46% | 23.04% | 25.10% | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWG achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly higher than GSLC.L's -5.34% return.
COWG
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -3.92%
- 6M
- -7.05%
- 1Y
- 9.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSLC.L
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -3.19%
- 1Y
- 14.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COWG vs. GSLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than GSLC.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COWG vs. GSLC.L — Risk / Return Rank
COWG
GSLC.L
COWG vs. GSLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWG | GSLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.88 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 1.33 | -0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.18 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 1.44 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.55 | 5.77 | -3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWG | GSLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.88 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 1.02 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between COWG and GSLC.L is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
COWG vs. GSLC.L - Dividend Comparison
COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while GSLC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% |
GSLC.L Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
COWG vs. GSLC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWG drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum GSLC.L drawdown of -29.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWG and GSLC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWG | GSLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -29.20% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.96% | -11.72% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -6.62% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -4.75% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 2.51% | +1.49% |
Volatility
COWG vs. GSLC.L - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta US Large Cap Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GSLC.L) have volatilities of 5.87% and 5.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COWG | GSLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 5.68% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 10.07% | +3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.50% | 16.95% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 19.42% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 21.51% | -2.19% |