CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund (CORE.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO).

CORE.TO and CBIL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CORE.TO is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jan 20, 2011. CBIL.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 12, 2023.

Performance

CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund (CORE.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CORE.TO PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund	0.15%	4.02%	0.77%
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF	0.30%	2.68%	1.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORE.TO achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than CBIL.TO's 0.30% return.

CORE.TO

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -2.31%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 6M: -0.27%
• 1Y: 1.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBIL.TO

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 2.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CORE.TO has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than CBIL.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.

CORE.TO

PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund

CBIL.TO

Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF

Return for Risk

CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CORE.TO

CORE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 20
CORE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
CORE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CORE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CORE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
CORE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 20

CBIL.TO

CBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund (CORE.TO) and Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CORE.TO	CBIL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	8.16	-7.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	13.19	-12.76
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	5.24	-4.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.56	15.01	-14.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	204.88	-203.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CORE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the CBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 8.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CORE.TO and CBIL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CORE.TO	CBIL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	8.16	-7.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	11.25	-10.64

Correlation

The correlation between CORE.TO and CBIL.TO is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Dividend Comparison

CORE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than CBIL.TO's 2.27% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CORE.TO PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund	3.43%	3.42%	0.32%	0.00%
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF	2.27%	2.59%	4.38%	3.39%

Drawdowns

CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORE.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.48%, which is greater than CBIL.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORE.TO and CBIL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CORE.TO	CBIL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-0.15%	-3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.00%	-0.15%	-2.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.31%	-0.15%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	0.00%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	0.01%	+1.55%

Volatility

CORE.TO vs. CBIL.TO - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Canadian Core Bond Fund (CORE.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) at 0.16%. This indicates that CORE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBIL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CORE.TO	CBIL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.77%	0.16%	+1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.89%	0.23%	+2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.62%	0.28%	+4.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.04%	0.33%	+4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.04%	0.33%	+4.71%