PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Staked Cosmos EUR (COMS.DE) and CoinShares Physical Staked Cardano EUR (CSDA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
COMS.DE
CoinShares Physical Staked Cosmos EUR
-10.58%-71.45%-37.78%24.55%32.65%
CSDA.DE
CoinShares Physical Staked Cardano EUR
-30.34%-63.21%50.69%155.13%-51.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMS.DE achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly higher than CSDA.DE's -30.34% return.


COMS.DE

1D
-0.20%
1M
-7.72%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-56.01%
1Y
-62.49%
3Y*
-45.40%
5Y*
10Y*

CSDA.DE

1D
-4.48%
1M
-11.98%
YTD
-30.34%
6M
-68.52%
1Y
-65.27%
3Y*
-15.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

COMS.DE has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CSDA.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMS.DE
COMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

CSDA.DE
CSDA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
CSDA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSDA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSDA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
CSDA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSDA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Staked Cosmos EUR (COMS.DE) and CoinShares Physical Staked Cardano EUR (CSDA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COMS.DECSDA.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.92

-0.89

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.50

-1.52

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

-0.91

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.50

-1.61

+0.11

COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMS.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is comparable to the CSDA.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMS.DE and CSDA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COMS.DECSDA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

-0.89

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

-0.29

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between COMS.DE and CSDA.DE is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither COMS.DE nor CSDA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMS.DE drawdown since its inception was -89.49%, which is greater than CSDA.DE's maximum drawdown of -81.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMS.DE and CSDA.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


COMS.DECSDA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.49%

-81.86%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.36%

-73.48%

+5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.30%

-81.86%

-7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-57.16%

+4.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.60%

41.52%

+0.08%

Volatility

COMS.DE vs. CSDA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoinShares Physical Staked Cosmos EUR (COMS.DE) is 11.54%, while CoinShares Physical Staked Cardano EUR (CSDA.DE) has a volatility of 16.87%. This indicates that COMS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSDA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


COMS.DECSDA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.54%

16.87%

-5.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.56%

52.16%

-0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.39%

73.51%

-6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.93%

84.41%

-9.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.93%

84.41%

-9.48%