COMM.TO vs. BIPC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Global Communications Index ETF (COMM.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO).

COMM.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive Media and Communications Index. It was launched on May 2, 2018.

Performance

COMM.TO vs. BIPC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Global Communications Index ETF (COMM.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COMM.TO vs. BIPC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
COMM.TO BMO Global Communications Index ETF	-0.97%	10.13%	38.71%	31.81%	-23.48%	10.09%	34.14%
BIPC.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation	-10.97%	12.64%	28.84%	-7.81%	-5.61%	-3.30%	92.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COMM.TO achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly higher than BIPC.TO's -10.97% return.

COMM.TO

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: -0.97%
• 6M: -6.49%
• 1Y: 10.68%
• 3Y*: 19.69%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

BIPC.TO

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -19.19%
• YTD: -10.97%
• 6M: -2.03%
• 1Y: 10.11%
• 3Y*: -0.05%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

COMM.TO vs. BIPC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COMM.TO

COMM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 33
COMM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
COMM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
COMM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
COMM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
COMM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 25

BIPC.TO

BIPC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 53
BIPC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BIPC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BIPC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BIPC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
BIPC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COMM.TO vs. BIPC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Communications Index ETF (COMM.TO) and Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COMM.TO	BIPC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.38	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.06	0.69	+0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.09	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	0.45	+0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.92	1.77	+0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COMM.TO vs. BIPC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COMM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the BIPC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COMM.TO and BIPC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COMM.TO	BIPC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	0.38	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.02	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.46	+0.30

Correlation

The correlation between COMM.TO and BIPC.TO is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

COMM.TO vs. BIPC.TO - Dividend Comparison

COMM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than BIPC.TO's 4.39% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
COMM.TO BMO Global Communications Index ETF	1.06%	1.07%	1.13%	1.51%	2.09%	1.60%	1.31%	1.52%	1.24%
BIPC.TO Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation	4.39%	3.87%	3.84%	4.38%	3.62%	2.99%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

COMM.TO vs. BIPC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COMM.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum BIPC.TO drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COMM.TO and BIPC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	COMM.TO	BIPC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.87%	-43.93%	+14.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.03%	-23.50%	+12.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.87%	-43.93%	+14.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.72%	-19.82%	+11.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-11.61%	+5.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.04%	6.04%	-1.00%

Volatility

COMM.TO vs. BIPC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Global Communications Index ETF (COMM.TO) is 5.86%, while Brookfield Infrastructure Corporation (BIPC.TO) has a volatility of 11.18%. This indicates that COMM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIPC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COMM.TO	BIPC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.86%	11.18%	-5.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.59%	19.78%	-10.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.22%	26.81%	-11.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.29%	27.11%	-12.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.66%	28.72%	-13.06%