PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) and Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNYE.TO achieves a -27.92% return, which is significantly lower than HLIF.TO's 9.41% return.


CNYE.TO

1D
-0.98%
1M
-6.29%
YTD
-27.92%
6M
-56.41%
1Y
-18.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HLIF.TO

1D
0.21%
1M
0.34%
YTD
9.41%
6M
16.84%
1Y
33.00%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNYE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HLIF.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNYE.TO
CNYE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CNYE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNYE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNYE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CNYE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNYE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

HLIF.TO
HLIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
HLIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) and Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNYE.TOHLIF.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.22

3.46

-3.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.25

4.36

-4.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.80

-0.77

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.25

3.95

-4.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.49

24.28

-24.77

CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNYE.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the HLIF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNYE.TO and HLIF.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNYE.TOHLIF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

3.46

-3.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

1.35

-1.78

Correlation

The correlation between CNYE.TO and HLIF.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Dividend Comparison

CNYE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 87.30%, more than HLIF.TO's 6.13% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
CNYE.TO
Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF
87.30%48.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HLIF.TO
Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A
6.13%6.26%7.33%7.96%3.91%

Drawdowns

CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNYE.TO drawdown since its inception was -72.18%, which is greater than HLIF.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNYE.TO and HLIF.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CNYE.TOHLIF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.18%

-11.12%

-61.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.18%

-8.43%

-63.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.52%

0.00%

-64.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.40%

-2.10%

-27.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.00%

1.38%

+34.62%

Volatility

CNYE.TO vs. HLIF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Coinbase Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNYE.TO) has a higher volatility of 24.38% compared to Harvest Canadian Equity Income Leaders ETF Class A (HLIF.TO) at 3.12%. This indicates that CNYE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CNYE.TOHLIF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.38%

3.12%

+21.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.46%

5.56%

+53.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.91%

9.58%

+73.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.42%

10.58%

+73.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.42%

10.58%

+73.84%