CNAL.L vs. 100D.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L).
CNAL.L and 100D.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CNAL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Aug 28, 2014. 100D.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. It was launched on Sep 24, 2021. Both CNAL.L and 100D.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CNAL.L vs. 100D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CNAL.L vs. 100D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAL.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR | 0.51% | 16.96% | 16.16% | -18.82% | -20.03% | 8.27% | 35.63% | -3.52% |
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 5.32% | 25.77% | 9.32% | 7.37% | 4.80% | 18.00% | -11.78% | 4.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNAL.L achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than 100D.L's 5.32% return.
CNAL.L
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
100D.L
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 11.26%
- 1Y
- 24.07%
- 3Y*
- 14.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CNAL.L vs. 100D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNAL.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than 100D.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CNAL.L vs. 100D.L — Risk / Return Rank
CNAL.L
100D.L
CNAL.L vs. 100D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNAL.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.78 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 2.25 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 2.62 | -1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.53 | 10.20 | -5.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNAL.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.78 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 1.00 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.54 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between CNAL.L and 100D.L is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CNAL.L vs. 100D.L - Dividend Comparison
CNAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNAL.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 3.59% | 3.78% | 4.17% | 3.90% | 3.80% | 3.39% | 3.11% | 4.30% |
Drawdowns
CNAL.L vs. 100D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNAL.L drawdown since its inception was -44.83%, which is greater than 100D.L's maximum drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNAL.L and 100D.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNAL.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.83% | -34.63% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -10.78% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.19% | -13.06% | -29.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.15% | -4.65% | -13.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.93% | -4.71% | -17.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.15% | 2.40% | +1.75% |
Volatility
CNAL.L vs. 100D.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAL.L) is 4.82%, while Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that CNAL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 100D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CNAL.L | 100D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 5.21% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.18% | 8.66% | +2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.90% | 13.45% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.17% | 12.89% | +19.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.12% | 15.98% | +25.14% |