PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMOD.L vs. DBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMOD.L vs. DBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMOD.L vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMOD.L
Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF
22.87%16.16%4.13%-7.56%14.50%27.35%-3.87%6.64%-10.22%0.08%
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
28.26%8.10%2.18%-6.19%19.34%41.36%-7.84%11.84%-11.63%4.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMOD.L achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 28.26% return.


CMOD.L

1D
-1.22%
1M
8.91%
YTD
22.87%
6M
30.50%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
13.29%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*

DBC

1D
-0.93%
1M
11.12%
YTD
28.26%
6M
31.82%
1Y
31.70%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMOD.L vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMOD.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMOD.L vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMOD.L
CMOD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMOD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMOD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CMOD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMOD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

DBC
DBC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMOD.L vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMOD.LDBCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.87

1.70

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

2.28

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.18

2.89

+1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.82

7.43

+2.38

CMOD.L vs. DBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMOD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the DBC Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMOD.L and DBC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMOD.LDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.70

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.76

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.10

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between CMOD.L and DBC is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CMOD.L vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison

CMOD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMOD.L
Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DBC
Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund
2.59%3.33%5.22%4.94%0.59%0.00%0.00%1.59%1.30%

Drawdowns

CMOD.L vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMOD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.16%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMOD.L and DBC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMOD.LDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.16%

-76.36%

+43.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-10.99%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

-27.34%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-25.80%

+24.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-46.42%

+33.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

4.27%

-1.17%

Volatility

CMOD.L vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF (CMOD.L) is 7.20%, while Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC) has a volatility of 8.30%. This indicates that CMOD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMOD.LDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

8.30%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

13.96%

-0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.22%

18.75%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

18.97%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.53%

17.72%

-3.19%