CMI vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CMI or XLF.
Key characteristics
| CMI | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 54.62% | 33.53% |
| 1Y Return | 66.81% | 45.44% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 18.67% | 9.36% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 17.54% | 13.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.79% | 11.93% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.77 | 3.36 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.83 | 4.72 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.48 | 1.61 |
| Calmar Ratio | 4.47 | 3.48 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.88 | 23.97 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.24% | 1.93% |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.28% | 13.75% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.66% | -82.69% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.71% | -0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMI and XLF is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CMI vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CMI achieves a 54.62% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 33.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CMI has outperformed XLF with an annualized return of 12.79%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively lower 11.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CMI vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cummins Inc. (CMI) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CMI vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
CMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than XLF's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMI Cummins Inc. | 1.89% | 2.71% | 2.49% | 2.57% | 2.33% | 2.74% | 3.32% | 2.38% | 2.93% | 3.99% | 1.95% | 1.60% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.34% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.61% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
CMI vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMI drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMI and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CMI vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Cummins Inc. (CMI) has a higher volatility of 9.69% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 7.03%. This indicates that CMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.