PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMG vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMG vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMG achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 20.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CMG has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 16.54%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 19.19% annualized return.


CMG

1D
-3.37%
1M
5.17%
6M
-4.24%
YTD
0.59%
1Y
-12.46%
3Y*
-1.63%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
16.54%
ALL TIME*
19.90%

MAR

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.03%
6M
18.71%
YTD
20.64%
1Y
47.30%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
21.60%
10Y*
19.19%
ALL TIME*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$612.37M$603.10M$624.35M
$498.48M$519.42M$558.67M

CMG vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
0.59%-38.64%31.83%64.83%-20.64%26.07%65.65%93.87%49.39%-23.40%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
20.64%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between CMG and MAR is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2006

0.39

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMG:

$47.77B

MAR:

$98.31B

EPS

CMG:

$1.08

MAR:

$14.30

PE Ratio

CMG:

34.43

MAR:

26.07

PEG Ratio

CMG:

1.29

MAR:

0.68

PS Ratio

CMG:

3.93

MAR:

3.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMG:

$12.42B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMG:

$5.89B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMG:

$2.25B

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMG vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CMG
CMG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
CMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
CMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CMG vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMGMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.28

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

3.38

-3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

9.06

-9.72

CMG vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMG Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMG and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMG vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMG drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, roughly equal to the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMG and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMGMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.61%

-75.59%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-12.65%

-23.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.89%

-30.50%

-28.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.89%

-30.50%

-28.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.89%

-61.26%

+2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.71%

-7.38%

-38.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.56%

-14.86%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.85%

4.72%

+15.13%

Volatility

CMG vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a higher volatility of 17.31% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 7.10%. This indicates that CMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMGMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.31%

7.10%

+10.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.05%

19.70%

+9.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.89%

26.66%

+13.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.19%

28.68%

+5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.97%

32.80%

+3.17%

Dividends

CMG vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.73%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%

Financials

CMG vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CMG and MAR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMG has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to MAR (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMG dropped -74.61% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMG and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer