CMCIX vs. CTSIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX).

CMCIX is an actively managed fund by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Jul 29, 2011. CTSIX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Mar 23, 2011.

Performance

CMCIX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMCIX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I	-4.71%	-5.28%	10.46%	7.81%
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	-4.77%	25.90%	44.34%	5.57%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CMCIX having a -4.71% return and CTSIX slightly lower at -4.77%.

CMCIX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -8.88%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: -7.29%
• 1Y: -5.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTSIX

• 1D: -3.92%
• 1M: -9.84%
• YTD: -4.77%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 36.02%
• 3Y*: 20.88%
• 5Y*: 2.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMCIX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMCIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

CMCIX

Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I

CTSIX

Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund

Return for Risk

CMCIX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCIX

CMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
CMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CTSIX

CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 79
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCIX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMCIX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	1.29	-1.58
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.30	1.84	-2.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.24	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	2.78	-3.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	10.72	-12.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMCIX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCIX and CTSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMCIX	CTSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	1.29	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.39	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between CMCIX and CTSIX is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CMCIX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

CMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CMCIX Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I	4.46%	4.25%	7.13%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CTSIX Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.77%	4.95%

Drawdowns

CMCIX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCIX drawdown since its inception was -21.50%, smaller than the maximum CTSIX drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCIX and CTSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMCIX	CTSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.50%	-50.83%	+29.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.55%	-12.38%	-0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.43%	-12.38%	-4.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-21.13%	+14.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.90%	3.20%	+1.70%

Volatility

CMCIX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Small/Mid-Cap Fund Class I (CMCIX) is 4.68%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 12.38%. This indicates that CMCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMCIX	CTSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.68%	12.38%	-7.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	21.14%	-10.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.19%	29.23%	-10.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	27.79%	-11.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.61%	29.69%	-13.08%