PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (5ESG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOD.DE achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than 5ESG.DE's -2.88% return.


CLOD.DE

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
0.61%
6M
0.52%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

5ESG.DE

1D
1.71%
1M
-3.44%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
1.77%
1Y
11.78%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 5ESG.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOD.DE
CLOD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CLOD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

5ESG.DE
5ESG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
5ESG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5ESG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
5ESG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
5ESG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
5ESG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (5ESG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLOD.DE5ESG.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

0.69

+1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

1.02

+1.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.15

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.36

+1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.26

5.37

+5.88

CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the 5ESG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOD.DE and 5ESG.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLOD.DE5ESG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

0.69

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

1.08

+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD.DE and 5ESG.DE is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE - Dividend Comparison

CLOD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, while 5ESG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD.DE drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum 5ESG.DE drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD.DE and 5ESG.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLOD.DE5ESG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.76%

-23.40%

+22.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-13.70%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-4.93%

+4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.16%

-3.98%

+3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

2.21%

-2.00%

Volatility

CLOD.DE vs. 5ESG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco EUR AAA CLO UCITS ETF Dist (CLOD.DE) is 0.38%, while Invesco S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF Acc (5ESG.DE) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that CLOD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5ESG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLOD.DE5ESG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

3.74%

-3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.98%

8.35%

-7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

16.96%

-15.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.30%

15.24%

-13.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.30%

16.96%

-15.66%