PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIG vs. ARCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CIGARCC
YTD Return29.04%15.51%
1Y Return18.79%20.37%
3Y Return (Ann)27.90%11.46%
5Y Return (Ann)23.85%13.35%
10Y Return (Ann)12.54%13.08%
Sharpe Ratio0.551.76
Sortino Ratio0.962.48
Omega Ratio1.121.32
Calmar Ratio0.832.88
Martin Ratio2.1112.19
Ulcer Index8.71%1.64%
Daily Std Dev33.36%11.35%
Max Drawdown-85.21%-79.36%
Current Drawdown-0.93%-0.64%

Fundamentals


CIGARCC
Market Cap$6.27B$13.91B
EPS$0.36$2.60
PE Ratio5.368.28
PEG Ratio0.003.95
Total Revenue (TTM)$28.45B$2.34B
Gross Profit (TTM)$7.01B$1.99B
EBITDA (TTM)$6.96B$1.30B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CIG and ARCC is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CIG vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CIG achieves a 29.04% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's 15.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CIG having a 12.54% annualized return and ARCC not far ahead at 13.08%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.64%
6.87%
CIG
ARCC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIG vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIG, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.55
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIG, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.96
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIG, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIG, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIG, currently valued at 2.11, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.11
ARCC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ARCC, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ARCC, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ARCC, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ARCC, currently valued at 2.88, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.88
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ARCC, currently valued at 12.19, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.19

CIG vs. ARCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the ARCC Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIG and ARCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.55
1.76
CIG
ARCC

Dividends

CIG vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison

CIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.78%, more than ARCC's 8.90% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CIG
Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais
14.78%10.79%15.27%14.23%7.24%5.86%9.20%7.74%21.97%25.69%47.76%19.32%
ARCC
Ares Capital Corporation
8.90%9.59%10.12%7.65%9.47%9.01%9.88%9.67%9.22%11.02%10.06%8.84%

Drawdowns

CIG vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIG drawdown since its inception was -85.21%, which is greater than ARCC's maximum drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIG and ARCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.93%
-0.64%
CIG
ARCC

Volatility

CIG vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison

Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais (CIG) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.19%. This indicates that CIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
9.29%
3.19%
CIG
ARCC

Financials

CIG vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items