CHW.AX vs. BND

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Chilwa Minerals Limited (CHW.AX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).

BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.

Performance

CHW.AX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Chilwa Minerals Limited (CHW.AX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHW.AX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CHW.AX Chilwa Minerals Limited	-9.63%	24.67%	328.57%	0.00%
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	-3.09%	-0.69%	11.58%	1.54%

Different Trading Currencies

CHW.AX is traded in AUD, while BND is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BND values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHW.AX achieves a -9.63% return, which is significantly lower than BND's -3.09% return.

CHW.AX

• 1D: -9.14%
• 1M: -11.05%
• YTD: -9.63%
• 6M: -16.34%
• 1Y: 11.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BND

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: -3.09%
• 6M: -3.72%
• 1Y: -5.49%
• 3Y*: 2.92%
• 5Y*: 2.27%
• 10Y*: 2.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHW.AX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHW.AX

CHW.AX Risk / Return Rank: 46
CHW.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CHW.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
CHW.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
CHW.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
CHW.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BND

BND Risk / Return Rank: 48
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHW.AX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chilwa Minerals Limited (CHW.AX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHW.AX	BND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	-0.52	+0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	-0.71	+1.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.92	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	-0.43	+0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.47	-0.72	+1.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHW.AX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHW.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHW.AX and BND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHW.AX	BND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16	-0.52	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.31	+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between CHW.AX and BND is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

CHW.AX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

CHW.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHW.AX Chilwa Minerals Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF	3.92%	3.86%	3.67%	3.09%	2.60%	2.12%	2.38%	2.72%	2.81%	2.54%	2.51%	2.57%

Drawdowns

CHW.AX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHW.AX drawdown since its inception was -45.93%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -34.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHW.AX and BND.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHW.AX	BND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.93%	-18.58%	-27.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.93%	-2.44%	-43.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.41%	-2.32%	-35.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-3.07%	-15.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.82%	0.90%	+22.92%

Volatility

CHW.AX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Chilwa Minerals Limited (CHW.AX) has a higher volatility of 23.12% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 3.06%. This indicates that CHW.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHW.AX	BND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.12%	3.06%	+20.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.67%	6.46%	+40.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.78%	10.54%	+60.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	85.36%	10.33%	+75.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	85.36%	10.19%	+75.17%