CHPS vs. PTF
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF).
CHPS and PTF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHPS is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. PTF is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. It was launched on Oct 12, 2006. Both CHPS and PTF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CHPS vs. PTF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHPS vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 12.20% | 58.47% | 7.75% | 10.88% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 12.86% | 5.68% | 43.65% | -1.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 12.86% return.
CHPS
- 1D
- 5.84%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 33.13%
- 1Y
- 95.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTF
- 1D
- 5.98%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- 12.86%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 46.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- 21.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHPS vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHPS vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS
PTF
CHPS vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHPS | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | 1.20 | +1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 1.70 | +1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.23 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.39 | 2.50 | +2.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.93 | 9.12 | +9.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHPS | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 1.20 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.45 | +0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS and PTF is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CHPS vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison
CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, more than PTF's 0.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF | 0.60% | 0.68% | 1.75% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
Drawdowns
CHPS vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and PTF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -55.38% | +15.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.50% | -17.99% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.68% | -9.77% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -13.38% | +3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 4.92% | +0.06% |
Volatility
CHPS vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) is 13.99%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 16.55%. This indicates that CHPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS | PTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.99% | 16.55% | -2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.20% | 32.43% | -6.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.67% | 38.88% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 34.79% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.80% | 32.56% | +0.24% |