CHPS-U.TO vs. SGLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L).
CHPS-U.TO and SGLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHPS-U.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Jun 21, 2021. SGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both CHPS-U.TO and SGLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CHPS-U.TO vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHPS-U.TO vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 6.93% | 51.84% | 11.58% | 75.77% | -43.11% | -2.63% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 10.79% | 65.25% | 26.06% | 12.89% | -0.12% | 2.55% |
Different Trading Currencies
CHPS-U.TO is traded in USD, while SGLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SGLN.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS-U.TO achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than SGLN.L's 10.79% return.
CHPS-U.TO
- 1D
- 8.61%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- 1Y
- 86.00%
- 3Y*
- 34.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 23.54%
- 1Y
- 52.50%
- 3Y*
- 34.15%
- 5Y*
- 22.52%
- 10Y*
- 14.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHPS-U.TO vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
CHPS-U.TO vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS-U.TO
SGLN.L
CHPS-U.TO vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHPS-U.TO | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 1.98 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.93 | 2.47 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.48 | 2.98 | +3.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.99 | 11.41 | +7.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHPS-U.TO | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 1.98 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.49 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS-U.TO and SGLN.L is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CHPS-U.TO vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
CHPS-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while SGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.72% | 0.01% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CHPS-U.TO vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, which is greater than SGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS-U.TO and SGLN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS-U.TO | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.70% | -41.71% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -17.57% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -9.41% | +3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -14.78% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 4.27% | +0.19% |
Volatility
CHPS-U.TO vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.07% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) at 10.91%. This indicates that CHPS-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS-U.TO | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.07% | 10.91% | +4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.73% | 21.84% | +5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.98% | 26.33% | +12.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.25% | 17.32% | +21.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.25% | 15.77% | +23.48% |