CHPS-U.TO vs. QMVP.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO).

CHPS-U.TO and QMVP.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CHPS-U.TO is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Jun 21, 2021. QMVP.TO is a passively managed fund by Hamilton that tracks the performance of the Solactive Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index. It was launched on Jan 20, 2026. Both CHPS-U.TO and QMVP.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

CHPS-U.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHPS-U.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	-0.64%
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF	-7.00%

Different Trading Currencies

CHPS-U.TO is traded in USD, while QMVP.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the QMVP.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

CHPS-U.TO

• 1D: 8.61%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: 6.93%
• 6M: 16.02%
• 1Y: 86.00%
• 3Y*: 34.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMVP.TO

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: -3.02%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS-U.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS-U.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than QMVP.TO's 0.19% expense ratio.

CHPS-U.TO

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF

QMVP.TO

Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF

Return for Risk

CHPS-U.TO vs. QMVP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS-U.TO

CHPS-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CHPS-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CHPS-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CHPS-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS-U.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS-U.TO) and Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF (QMVP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHPS-U.TO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.22	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.48	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.99	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHPS-U.TO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	-1.32	+1.64

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS-U.TO and QMVP.TO is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CHPS-U.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHPS-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QMVP.TO's 0.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CHPS-U.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.14%	0.40%	0.72%	0.01%
QMVP.TO Hamilton Champions U.S. Technology Index ETF	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CHPS-U.TO vs. QMVP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -53.70%, which is greater than QMVP.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS-U.TO and QMVP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS-U.TO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.70%	-12.77%	-40.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.59%	-8.10%	+2.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-6.31%	-11.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CHPS-U.TO	QMVP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.07%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.73%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.98%	23.82%	+15.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.25%	23.82%	+15.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.25%	23.82%	+15.43%