PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Georgia Capital plc (CGEO.L) and Halma plc (HLMA.L).

Performance

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Georgia Capital plc (CGEO.L) and Halma plc (HLMA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CGEO.L
Georgia Capital plc		25.00%158.33%17.42%40.00%2.38%32.04%-41.43%-9.70%-8.32%
HLMA.L
Halma plc		9.89%32.52%18.70%16.78%-37.74%31.48%16.58%56.35%2.40%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CGEO.L:

£1.37B

HLMA.L:

£14.73B

EPS

CGEO.L:

£34.15

HLMA.L:

£1.46

PE Ratio

CGEO.L:

1.13

HLMA.L:

26.62

PEG Ratio

CGEO.L:

2.84

HLMA.L:

2.56

PS Ratio

CGEO.L:

1.14

HLMA.L:

3.70

PB Ratio

CGEO.L:

0.31

HLMA.L:

7.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

CGEO.L:

£1.20B

HLMA.L:

£3.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CGEO.L:

£1.19B

HLMA.L:

£1.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

CGEO.L:

£0.00

HLMA.L:

£936.80M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGEO.L achieves a 25.00% return, which is significantly higher than HLMA.L's 9.89% return.

CGEO.L

1D
1.57%
1M
5.73%
YTD
25.00%
6M
65.60%
1Y
147.13%
3Y*
69.91%
5Y*
45.27%
10Y*
—

HLMA.L

1D
0.88%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
9.89%
6M
11.33%
1Y
47.77%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
16.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Georgia Capital plc

Halma plc

Often compared with CGEO.L:
CGEO.L vs. PRXCXCGEO.L vs. SGOV
Often compared with HLMA.L:
HLMA.L vs. MSI.LHLMA.L vs. QQQHLMA.L vs. RMS.PAHLMA.L vs. HMWO.LHLMA.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CGEO.L
CGEO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CGEO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGEO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGEO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CGEO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGEO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
HLMA.L
HLMA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLMA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Georgia Capital plc (CGEO.L) and Halma plc (HLMA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CGEO.LHLMA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.24

1.99

+2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.33

2.80

+1.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.36

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

16.14

3.91

+12.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

50.81

15.74

+35.07

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CGEO.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.24, which is higher than the HLMA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CGEO.L and HLMA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CGEO.LHLMA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.24

1.99

+2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.45

0.42

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.68

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.62

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between CGEO.L and HLMA.L is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L - Dividend Comparison

CGEO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HLMA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGEO.L
Georgia Capital plc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HLMA.L
Halma plc		0.61%0.67%0.83%0.91%0.98%0.57%0.69%0.76%1.11%1.12%1.47%1.42%

Drawdowns

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGEO.L drawdown since its inception was -72.62%, which is greater than HLMA.L's maximum drawdown of -43.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGEO.L and HLMA.L.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CGEO.LHLMA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.62%

-43.68%

-28.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.11%

-13.53%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.08%

-42.86%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-42.86%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.07%

+7.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-11.24%

-19.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.36%

-0.34%

Volatility

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L - Volatility Comparison

Georgia Capital plc (CGEO.L) has a higher volatility of 9.94% compared to Halma plc (HLMA.L) at 8.82%. This indicates that CGEO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLMA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CGEO.LHLMA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.94%

8.82%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.32%

18.18%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.50%

23.95%

+10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.23%

25.31%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.08%

24.35%

+10.73%

Financials

CGEO.L vs. HLMA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Georgia Capital plc and Halma plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJuly
982.58M
1.24B
(CGEO.L) Total Revenue
(HLMA.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items