CFIPX vs. MWOFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CFIPX (Franklin Global Equity Fund) and MWOFX (MFS Global Growth Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CFIPX returned 14.63%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for MWOFX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CFIPX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for MWOFX.

Performance

CFIPX vs. MWOFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CFIPX achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly higher than MWOFX's -4.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CFIPX has outperformed MWOFX with an annualized return of 14.63%, while MWOFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.58% annualized return.

CFIPX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 6M: 8.16%
• 1Y: 26.67%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: 13.29%
• 10Y*: 14.63%

MWOFX

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -0.88%
• YTD: -4.62%
• 6M: -5.27%
• 1Y: 0.95%
• 3Y*: 6.64%
• 5Y*: 3.46%
• 10Y*: 10.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CFIPX vs. MWOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund	9.43%	23.21%	24.28%	23.03%	-16.36%	24.76%	13.34%	30.63%	-12.16%	23.69%
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund	-4.62%	7.17%	10.68%	20.63%	-19.28%	18.33%	20.23%	35.37%	-4.94%	31.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CFIPX and MWOFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1993	0.83

The correlation between CFIPX and MWOFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CFIPX vs. MWOFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CFIPX

CFIPX Risk / Return Rank: 74
CFIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CFIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CFIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CFIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
CFIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

MWOFX

MWOFX Risk / Return Rank: 4
MWOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MWOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MWOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MWOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MWOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFIPX vs. MWOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) and MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CFIPX	MWOFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	0.16	+2.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	0.30	+2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.04	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	0.14	+3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.29	0.42	+14.87

CFIPX vs. MWOFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CFIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the MWOFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CFIPX and MWOFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CFIPX vs. MWOFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFIPX drawdown since its inception was -62.70%, which is greater than MWOFX's maximum drawdown of -56.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFIPX and MWOFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFIPX	MWOFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.70%	-56.10%	-6.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.28%	-13.82%	+5.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.20%	-16.45%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.44%	-27.64%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.98%	-31.68%	-2.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-6.91%	+6.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.40%	-11.90%	-4.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	4.62%	-2.79%

Volatility

CFIPX vs. MWOFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Global Equity Fund (CFIPX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to MFS Global Growth Fund (MWOFX) at 4.15%. This indicates that CFIPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MWOFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CFIPX	MWOFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	4.15%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	10.01%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.37%	12.44%	-0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.20%	15.87%	+0.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	16.63%	+0.66%

CFIPX vs. MWOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CFIPX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MWOFX's 1.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

CFIPX vs. MWOFX - Dividend Comparison

CFIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than MWOFX's 5.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFIPX Franklin Global Equity Fund	5.86%	6.41%	3.49%	0.99%	4.99%	8.99%	0.73%	13.31%	7.86%	0.77%	1.52%	1.01%
MWOFX MFS Global Growth Fund	5.69%	5.42%	5.14%	2.09%	3.60%	6.25%	3.13%	1.86%	5.00%	3.43%	1.68%	6.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CFIPX and MWOFX in my portfolio?

CFIPX and MWOFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CFIPX or MWOFX?

CFIPX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to MWOFX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CFIPX dropped -62.70% vs MWOFX's -56.10%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.