CFB vs. UMBF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (CFB) and UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF).

Performance

CFB vs. UMBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (CFB) and UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CFB vs. UMBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CFB CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.	0.00%
UMBF UMB Financial Corporation	-15.71%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) CFB : $442.62M UMBF : $4.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) CFB : $442.62M UMBF : $1.70B
EBITDA (TTM) CFB : $80.17M UMBF : $739.37M

Returns By Period

CFB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMBF

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: -2.30%
• YTD: -1.58%
• 6M: -3.97%
• 1Y: 13.21%
• 3Y*: 27.21%
• 5Y*: 5.81%
• 10Y*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CFB vs. UMBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMBF

UMBF Risk / Return Rank: 55
UMBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
UMBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
UMBF Omega Ratio Rank: 51
UMBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
UMBF Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CFB vs. UMBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc. (CFB) and UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CFB	UMBF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.25	—

Dividends

CFB vs. UMBF - Dividend Comparison

CFB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UMBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFB CrossFirst Bankshares, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMBF UMB Financial Corporation	1.47%	1.42%	1.39%	1.83%	1.78%	1.30%	1.81%	1.76%	1.92%	1.45%	1.28%	2.04%

Drawdowns

CFB vs. UMBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CFB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum UMBF drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CFB and UMBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CFB	UMBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-52.70%	+52.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.57%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-15.71%	+15.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-17.83%	+17.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CFB	UMBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.44%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	32.15%	-32.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	33.37%	-33.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	33.54%	-33.54%

Financials