CEG.L vs. MCD

In the year-to-date period, CEG.L achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly higher than MCD's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, CEG.L has underperformed MCD with an annualized return of -41.99%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Challenger Energy Group plc (CEG.L) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CEG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the MCD Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CEG.L and MCD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CEG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.

The maximum CEG.L drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than MCD's maximum drawdown of -73.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEG.L and MCD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Challenger Energy Group plc (CEG.L) has a higher volatility of 17.32% compared to McDonald's Corporation (MCD) at 7.42%. This indicates that CEG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Challenger Energy Group plc and McDonald's Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.