CEBZ.DE vs. NQSE.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEBZ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE).
CEBZ.DE and NQSE.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CEBZ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe Index. It was launched on Jul 6, 2007. NQSE.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2010. Both CEBZ.DE and NQSE.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CEBZ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CEBZ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CEBZ.DE iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 1.27% | 20.45% | 1.33% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | -6.44% | 18.16% | 14.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CEBZ.DE achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than NQSE.DE's -6.44% return.
CEBZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 5.66%
- 1Y
- 13.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- -6.44%
- 6M
- -4.26%
- 1Y
- 20.47%
- 3Y*
- 20.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CEBZ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CEBZ.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CEBZ.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CEBZ.DE
NQSE.DE
CEBZ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEBZ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CEBZ.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.23 | 1.56 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.16 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | 7.74 | -0.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CEBZ.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.03 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.67 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between CEBZ.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CEBZ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CEBZ.DE nor NQSE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CEBZ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CEBZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.41%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CEBZ.DE and NQSE.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CEBZ.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -37.67% | +21.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.97% | -11.87% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.53% | -8.83% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -8.72% | +6.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 3.31% | -0.92% |
Volatility
CEBZ.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CEBZ.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CEBZ.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 5.83% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 12.28% | -3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.23% | 19.88% | -4.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 20.89% | -7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 21.60% | -8.13% |