CCMMX vs. WWNPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Conestoga Mid Cap Fund (CCMMX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX).
CCMMX is managed by Conestoga Capital Advisors. It was launched on Jun 28, 2021. WWNPX is managed by Kinetics. It was launched on Dec 31, 1999.
Performance
CCMMX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCMMX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCMMX Conestoga Mid Cap Fund | 0.14% | -2.22% | 3.84% | 22.45% | -30.34% | 6.80% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 38.76% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | -8.51% |
Returns By Period
CCMMX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WWNPX
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -9.22%
- YTD
- 38.76%
- 6M
- 23.34%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 30.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.21%
- 10Y*
- 20.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCMMX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCMMX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCMMX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
CCMMX
WWNPX
CCMMX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Conestoga Mid Cap Fund (CCMMX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCMMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.55 | — |
Correlation
The correlation between CCMMX and WWNPX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CCMMX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
CCMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than WWNPX's 5.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCMMX Conestoga Mid Cap Fund | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 5.92% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% |
Drawdowns
CCMMX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCMMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -67.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -15.90% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -13.85% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.16% | — |
Volatility
CCMMX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCMMX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.58% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 36.48% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 32.56% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 28.17% | — |