PortfoliosLab logo
CCBG vs. LYG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CCBG and LYG is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CCBG vs. LYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CCBG:

1.47

LYG:

1.84

Sortino Ratio

CCBG:

2.13

LYG:

2.38

Omega Ratio

CCBG:

1.27

LYG:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

CCBG:

1.77

LYG:

0.70

Martin Ratio

CCBG:

6.67

LYG:

7.30

Ulcer Index

CCBG:

6.50%

LYG:

7.93%

Daily Std Dev

CCBG:

30.18%

LYG:

31.79%

Max Drawdown

CCBG:

-79.86%

LYG:

-94.82%

Current Drawdown

CCBG:

-4.06%

LYG:

-71.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCBG:

$653.54M

LYG:

$63.04B

EPS

CCBG:

$3.37

LYG:

$0.34

PE Ratio

CCBG:

11.37

LYG:

12.38

PEG Ratio

CCBG:

4.32

LYG:

2.42

PS Ratio

CCBG:

2.77

LYG:

3.59

PB Ratio

CCBG:

1.28

LYG:

0.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCBG:

$253.49M

LYG:

$22.32B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCBG:

$253.68M

LYG:

$22.32B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCBG:

$71.91M

LYG:

$1.61B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCBG achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly lower than LYG's 59.41% return. Over the past 10 years, CCBG has outperformed LYG with an annualized return of 12.28%, while LYG has yielded a comparatively lower 2.39% annualized return.


CCBG

YTD

3.66%

1M

3.28%

6M

-2.91%

1Y

44.00%

3Y*

14.25%

5Y*

16.02%

10Y*

12.28%

LYG

YTD

59.41%

1M

6.58%

6M

60.59%

1Y

57.90%

3Y*

29.86%

5Y*

29.95%

10Y*

2.39%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

Lloyds Banking Group plc

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CCBG vs. LYG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCBG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CCBG is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CCBG is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CCBG is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CCBG is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CCBG is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CCBG is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

LYG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LYG is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LYG is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LYG is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LYG is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LYG is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LYG is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CCBG vs. LYG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CCBG Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the LYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCBG and LYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

CCBG vs. LYG - Dividend Comparison

CCBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than LYG's 3.78% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CCBG
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
2.41%2.40%2.58%2.03%2.35%2.32%1.57%1.38%1.05%0.83%0.85%0.58%
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.78%5.44%5.27%4.95%2.71%5.35%5.05%6.64%4.29%5.03%2.13%0.00%

Drawdowns

CCBG vs. LYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCBG drawdown since its inception was -79.86%, smaller than the maximum LYG drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCBG and LYG.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

CCBG vs. LYG - Volatility Comparison

Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) at 8.17%. This indicates that CCBG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CCBG vs. LYG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capital City Bank Group, Inc. and Lloyds Banking Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
58.99M
4.70B
(CCBG) Total Revenue
(LYG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCBG vs. LYG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Capital City Bank Group, Inc. and Lloyds Banking Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(CCBG) Gross Margin
(LYG) Gross Margin
CCBG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.99M and revenue of 58.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

LYG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 4.70B and revenue of 4.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CCBG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 21.99M and revenue of 58.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.3%.

LYG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 1.83B and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.9%.

CCBG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. reported a net income of 16.86M and revenue of 58.99M, resulting in a net margin of 28.6%.

LYG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.12B and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.