PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CCBG vs. LYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CCBG vs. LYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CCBG vs. LYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CCBG
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
4.51%19.12%28.06%-7.14%25.82%10.03%-17.34%33.95%2.49%13.28%
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
-1.70%103.71%20.30%14.68%-9.47%33.81%-40.79%36.81%-28.35%30.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CCBG:

$757.76M

LYG:

$77.88B

EPS

CCBG:

$3.60

LYG:

$0.31

PE Ratio

CCBG:

12.29

LYG:

16.86

PEG Ratio

CCBG:

0.68

LYG:

8.43

PS Ratio

CCBG:

2.71

LYG:

1.21

PB Ratio

CCBG:

1.37

LYG:

1.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

CCBG:

$279.31M

LYG:

$65.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CCBG:

$243.30M

LYG:

$65.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

CCBG:

$89.37M

LYG:

$6.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CCBG achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly higher than LYG's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CCBG has outperformed LYG with an annualized return of 14.35%, while LYG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.55% annualized return.


CCBG

1D
0.87%
1M
3.32%
YTD
4.51%
6M
7.13%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
14.35%

LYG

1D
-0.19%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
15.01%
1Y
41.85%
3Y*
36.88%
5Y*
22.79%
10Y*
7.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CCBG vs. LYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CCBG
CCBG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CCBG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCBG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCBG Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CCBG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCBG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

LYG
LYG Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYG Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CCBG vs. LYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) and Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CCBGLYGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

1.44

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.45

1.95

-0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.89

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.12

6.52

-1.40

CCBG vs. LYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CCBG Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the LYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CCBG and LYG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CCBGLYGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.44

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.72

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.21

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

-0.03

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between CCBG and LYG is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CCBG vs. LYG - Dividend Comparison

CCBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than LYG's 3.24% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCBG
Capital City Bank Group, Inc.
2.33%2.35%2.40%2.58%2.03%2.35%2.32%1.57%1.38%1.05%0.83%0.85%
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
3.24%3.19%5.44%5.23%4.92%2.70%0.00%5.04%6.63%6.81%5.17%2.11%

Drawdowns

CCBG vs. LYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CCBG drawdown since its inception was -79.86%, smaller than the maximum LYG drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCBG and LYG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CCBGLYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.86%

-94.84%

+14.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-22.72%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.36%

-40.19%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.20%

-68.72%

+23.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-59.37%

+55.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.38%

-63.46%

+35.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

6.59%

-1.42%

Volatility

CCBG vs. LYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (CCBG) is 4.82%, while Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) has a volatility of 10.89%. This indicates that CCBG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CCBGLYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

10.89%

-6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.89%

20.12%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.12%

29.18%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.90%

31.86%

-3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.19%

36.46%

-2.27%

Financials

CCBG vs. LYG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Capital City Bank Group, Inc. and Lloyds Banking Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00B0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
71.82M
50.75B
(CCBG) Total Revenue
(LYG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CCBG vs. LYG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Capital City Bank Group, Inc. and Lloyds Banking Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
88.4%
100.0%
Portfolio components
CCBG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.46M and revenue of 71.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.4%.

LYG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a gross profit of 50.75B and revenue of 50.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CCBG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 20.60M and revenue of 71.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.7%.

LYG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported an operating income of 1.98B and revenue of 50.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

CCBG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Capital City Bank Group, Inc. reported a net income of 13.71M and revenue of 71.82M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.

LYG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lloyds Banking Group plc reported a net income of 1.27B and revenue of 50.75B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.