PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than MNY.TO's 0.56% return.


CASH.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.02%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
10Y*

MNY.TO

1D
0.01%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.56%
6M
1.27%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
0.50%2.45%4.53%5.11%1.26%
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
0.56%3.03%4.69%5.03%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between CASH.TO and MNY.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners. Combining low-correlation assets is one of the most reliable ways to reduce portfolio risk without sacrificing expected returns.


CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than MNY.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CASH.TO
CASH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

MNY.TO
MNY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CASH.TOMNY.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.49

15.35

-4.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

33.16

52.77

-19.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

7.74

20.00

-12.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

115.84

67.62

+48.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

479.20

621.44

-142.24

CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 10.49, which is lower than the MNY.TO Sharpe Ratio of 15.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CASH.TO and MNY.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CASH.TOMNY.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49

15.35

-4.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.51

11.03

-5.52

Drawdowns

CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, which is greater than MNY.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and MNY.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CASH.TOMNY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-0.24%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.04%

+0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility

CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.05% compared to Purpose Cash Management Fund (MNY.TO) at 0.03%. This indicates that CASH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CASH.TOMNY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

0.03%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

0.13%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

0.18%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.62%

0.38%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.62%

0.38%

+0.24%

Dividends

CASH.TO vs. MNY.TO - Dividend Comparison

CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than MNY.TO's 2.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
2.31%2.53%4.37%5.06%2.30%0.10%
MNY.TO
Purpose Cash Management Fund
2.67%2.93%4.71%4.85%1.47%0.00%