C300.L vs. JRCE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L).
C300.L and JRCE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. C300.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P China A 300 Index. It was launched on May 5, 2022. JRCE.L is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. Both C300.L and JRCE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
C300.L vs. JRCE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
C300.L vs. JRCE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 2.00% | 33.78% | 14.79% | -11.81% | 1.72% |
JRCE.L JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) | -0.69% | 28.79% | 9.53% | -13.40% | 2.35% |
Different Trading Currencies
C300.L is traded in USD, while JRCE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRCE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C300.L achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly higher than JRCE.L's -0.69% return.
C300.L
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- 35.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JRCE.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 26.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
C300.L vs. JRCE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
C300.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JRCE.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
C300.L vs. JRCE.L — Risk / Return Rank
C300.L
JRCE.L
C300.L vs. JRCE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C300.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.62 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 2.13 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.30 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 2.52 | +0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.06 | 10.63 | +4.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C300.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.62 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -0.02 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between C300.L and JRCE.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
C300.L vs. JRCE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither C300.L nor JRCE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
C300.L vs. JRCE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C300.L drawdown since its inception was -31.77%, smaller than the maximum JRCE.L drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C300.L and JRCE.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| C300.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.77% | -36.68% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -8.58% | -2.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -5.10% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.62% | -18.24% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.90% | -0.56% |
Volatility
C300.L vs. JRCE.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) at 4.92%. This indicates that C300.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRCE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| C300.L | JRCE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 4.92% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.09% | 10.80% | +1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.91% | 16.42% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 23.16% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 23.16% | -1.03% |