BUFI vs. EAPR

Last updated Apr 17, 2026

BUFI (AB International Buffer ETF) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. BUFI is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, BUFI returned 18.01% vs 24.30% for EAPR. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BUFI charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.

Performance

BUFI vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUFI achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 7.81% return.

BUFI

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 2.97%
• YTD: 4.18%
• 6M: 6.80%
• 1Y: 18.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EAPR

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 6.29%
• YTD: 7.81%
• 6M: 9.89%
• 1Y: 24.30%
• 3Y*: 9.37%
• 5Y*: 4.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUFI vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BUFI AB International Buffer ETF	4.18%	16.50%	-1.31%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	7.81%	14.80%	-2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BUFI and EAPR is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	0.59

The correlation between BUFI and EAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 — a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BUFI vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUFI

BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 61
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 63

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUFI vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUFI	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	3.98	-1.66
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	8.06	-4.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	2.22	-0.76
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	16.62	-13.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.37	67.51	-54.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUFI vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUFI Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the EAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUFI and EAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUFI	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	3.98	-1.66
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	0.49	+1.12

Drawdowns

BUFI vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUFI drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFI and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUFI	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-17.65%	+10.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.69%	-1.42%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	0.00%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.86%	-4.15%	+3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	0.35%	+1.02%

Volatility

BUFI vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison

AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR) have volatilities of 4.25% and 4.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUFI	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	4.09%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.39%	4.49%	+1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.88%	6.19%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.99%	9.96%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.99%	9.94%	-0.95%

BUFI vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUFI has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUFI vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither BUFI nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments