BUFF vs. ZMAR
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR).
BUFF and ZMAR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUFF is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2016. ZMAR is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Mar 3, 2025.
Performance
BUFF vs. ZMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BUFF vs. ZMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | -0.90% | 10.48% |
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.33% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BUFF achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than ZMAR's 0.33% return.
BUFF
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 1.13%
- 1Y
- 12.07%
- 3Y*
- 11.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.68%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMAR
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 7.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUFF vs. ZMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUFF has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMAR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BUFF vs. ZMAR — Risk / Return Rank
BUFF
ZMAR
BUFF vs. ZMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BUFF | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 2.28 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.84 | 3.60 | -1.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.54 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 3.79 | -2.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 19.05 | -9.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BUFF | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 2.28 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.83 | -1.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between BUFF and ZMAR is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BUFF vs. ZMAR - Dividend Comparison
Neither BUFF nor ZMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BUFF vs. ZMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUFF drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than ZMAR's maximum drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUFF and ZMAR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BUFF | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.23% | -2.30% | -43.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.15% | -1.92% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -0.77% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.29% | -0.25% | -6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.27% | 0.38% | +0.89% |
Volatility
BUFF vs. ZMAR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) at 1.19%. This indicates that BUFF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BUFF | ZMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 1.19% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.05% | 1.67% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.82% | 3.11% | +6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.40% | 3.21% | +5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 3.21% | +14.62% |