PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE) and 21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP (21BC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BTIC.DE
Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP
-20.75%-16.58%129.65%148.86%-35.27%
21BC.DE
21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP
-21.79%-5.79%116.97%158.71%-31.72%
Different Trading Currencies

BTIC.DE is traded in USD, while 21BC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 21BC.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTIC.DE achieves a -20.75% return, which is significantly higher than 21BC.DE's -21.79% return.


BTIC.DE

1D
2.00%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
-20.75%
6M
-40.88%
1Y
-24.81%
3Y*
30.72%
5Y*
10Y*

21BC.DE

1D
2.37%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-21.79%
6M
-41.53%
1Y
-19.16%
3Y*
34.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BTIC.DE and 21BC.DE have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTIC.DE
BTIC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTIC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTIC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

21BC.DE
21BC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
21BC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
21BC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
21BC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
21BC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
21BC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE) and 21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP (21BC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BTIC.DE21BC.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.61

-0.48

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.70

-0.46

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.95

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

-0.43

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.14

-0.91

-0.23

BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTIC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is comparable to the 21BC.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTIC.DE and 21BC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BTIC.DE21BC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

-0.48

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.68

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between BTIC.DE and 21BC.DE is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither BTIC.DE nor 21BC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTIC.DE drawdown since its inception was -70.64%, which is greater than 21BC.DE's maximum drawdown of -49.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTIC.DE and 21BC.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BTIC.DE21BC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.64%

-49.40%

-21.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.42%

-49.40%

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.59%

-44.57%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-12.91%

-18.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.00%

22.98%

+0.02%

Volatility

BTIC.DE vs. 21BC.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Bitcoin ETP (BTIC.DE) and 21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP (21BC.DE) have volatilities of 13.19% and 13.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BTIC.DE21BC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.19%

13.23%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.67%

32.65%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.24%

40.12%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.51%

47.37%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.51%

47.37%

+3.14%