BTEC vs. HEAL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L).
BTEC and HEAL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTEC is a passively managed fund by Principal that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ U.S. Health Care Innovators Index. It was launched on Aug 19, 2016. HEAL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Sep 8, 2016. Both BTEC and HEAL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BTEC vs. HEAL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BTEC vs. HEAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BTEC Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF | 0.00% |
HEAL.L iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -3.63% |
Returns By Period
BTEC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEAL.L
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- -2.11%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 20.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.36%
- 5Y*
- -2.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BTEC vs. HEAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
BTEC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than HEAL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BTEC vs. HEAL.L — Risk / Return Rank
BTEC
HEAL.L
BTEC vs. HEAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF (BTEC) and iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BTEC | HEAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.32 | — |
Dividends
BTEC vs. HEAL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither BTEC nor HEAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
BTEC vs. HEAL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BTEC drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum HEAL.L drawdown of -46.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTEC and HEAL.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BTEC | HEAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -46.43% | +46.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.18% | +22.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -18.53% | +18.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility
BTEC vs. HEAL.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BTEC | HEAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 19.29% | -19.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 19.88% | -19.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 19.90% | -19.90% |