BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO).

BTCC-B.TO and PSA.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BTCC-B.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 14, 2021. PSA.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013.

Performance

BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BTCC-B.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units	-21.35%	-11.83%	136.57%	148.15%	-62.24%	-14.97%
PSA.TO Purpose High Interest Savings Fund	0.51%	2.64%	4.56%	5.12%	2.34%	0.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BTCC-B.TO achieves a -21.35% return, which is significantly lower than PSA.TO's 0.51% return.

BTCC-B.TO

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: -21.35%
• 6M: -42.60%
• 1Y: -23.22%
• 3Y*: 33.05%
• 5Y*: 3.55%
• 10Y*: —

PSA.TO

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 2.43%
• 3Y*: 3.88%
• 5Y*: 3.11%
• 10Y*: 2.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BTCC-B.TO has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than PSA.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.

BTCC-B.TO

Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units

PSA.TO

Purpose High Interest Savings Fund

Return for Risk

BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BTCC-B.TO

BTCC-B.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5
BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BTCC-B.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BTCC-B.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BTCC-B.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BTCC-B.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PSA.TO

PSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
PSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) and Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BTCC-B.TO	PSA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.53	10.29	-10.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	28.35	-28.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	6.22	-5.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	121.90	-122.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.89	422.60	-423.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BTCC-B.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 10.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BTCC-B.TO and PSA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BTCC-B.TO	PSA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.53	10.29	-10.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	11.42	-11.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	9.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	9.23	-9.14

Correlation

The correlation between BTCC-B.TO and PSA.TO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO - Dividend Comparison

BTCC-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTCC-B.TO Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSA.TO Purpose High Interest Savings Fund	2.41%	2.61%	4.47%	5.05%	2.26%	0.59%	0.94%	2.18%	1.66%	1.07%	0.99%	1.07%

Drawdowns

BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BTCC-B.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.12%, which is greater than PSA.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BTCC-B.TO and PSA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BTCC-B.TO	PSA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.12%	-0.04%	-75.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.47%	-0.02%	-50.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-75.12%	-0.04%	-75.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-46.27%	0.00%	-46.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.53%	0.00%	-32.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.85%	0.01%	+23.84%

Volatility

BTCC-B.TO vs. PSA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Purpose Bitcoin ETF Non-Currency Hedged Units (BTCC-B.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) at 0.06%. This indicates that BTCC-B.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BTCC-B.TO	PSA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.52%	0.06%	+12.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.11%	0.17%	+35.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.39%	0.24%	+44.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.31%	0.27%	+55.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.52%	0.23%	+55.29%