BSCU vs. PDBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX).
BSCU is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2030 Index. It was launched on Sep 16, 2020. PDBZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 14, 1997.
Performance
BSCU vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BSCU vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF | -0.09% | 8.24% | 3.12% | 8.66% | -15.08% | -3.02% | 2.07% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.53% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 1.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BSCU achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's -0.53% return.
BSCU
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 5.53%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.07%
- 10Y*
- —
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BSCU vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BSCU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BSCU vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
BSCU
PDBZX
BSCU vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BSCU | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 1.04 | +0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.18 | 1.48 | +0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.18 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 1.75 | +0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.45 | 5.12 | +4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BSCU | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.04 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.17 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.09 | -1.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between BSCU and PDBZX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BSCU vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
BSCU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than PDBZX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCU Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.63% | 4.56% | 4.70% | 4.07% | 3.06% | 1.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.19% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
BSCU vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BSCU drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSCU and PDBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BSCU | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.34% | -20.88% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.39% | -3.06% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.74% | -20.81% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -2.52% | +1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -2.31% | -5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 1.05% | -0.47% |
Volatility
BSCU vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCU) is 1.40%, while PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that BSCU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BSCU | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.40% | 1.72% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.02% | 2.71% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 4.59% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.66% | 6.00% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 5.34% | +1.21% |