PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRTR vs. SCHZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BRTR vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BRTR vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
-0.32%8.11%1.29%0.43%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.13%7.24%1.26%0.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRTR achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly lower than SCHZ's 0.13% return.


BRTR

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-0.32%
6M
0.67%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHZ

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.79%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
3.59%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
1.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BRTR vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRTR has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BRTR vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRTR
BRTR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BRTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BRTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHZ
SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRTR vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRTRSCHZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

0.96

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.36

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.79

-0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.89

5.11

-0.22

BRTR vs. SCHZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the SCHZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRTR and SCHZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRTRSCHZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

0.96

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.44

+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between BRTR and SCHZ is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BRTR vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison

BRTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, more than SCHZ's 4.10% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRTR
Blackrock Total Return ETF
4.84%4.86%5.58%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.10%4.05%3.96%3.28%2.63%2.16%2.43%2.79%2.56%2.40%2.24%2.11%

Drawdowns

BRTR vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRTR drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, smaller than the maximum SCHZ drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRTR and SCHZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BRTRSCHZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-18.74%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-2.51%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-2.63%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-3.70%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.88%

+0.09%

Volatility

BRTR vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison

Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) at 1.66%. This indicates that BRTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BRTRSCHZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

1.66%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

2.50%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

4.29%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.75%

6.06%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.75%

5.40%

-0.65%