BRKY.NEO vs. XMU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO).
BRKY.NEO and XMU.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BRKY.NEO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Dec 19, 2022. XMU.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2012.
Performance
BRKY.NEO vs. XMU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BRKY.NEO vs. XMU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF | -6.22% | 9.35% | 33.86% | 15.68% | 2.15% |
XMU.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF | -0.16% | -0.84% | 21.99% | 6.59% | -0.28% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BRKY.NEO achieves a -6.22% return, which is significantly lower than XMU.TO's -0.16% return.
BRKY.NEO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.50%
- YTD
- -6.22%
- 6M
- -5.97%
- 1Y
- -13.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XMU.TO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- -0.16%
- 6M
- -5.37%
- 1Y
- -5.96%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BRKY.NEO vs. XMU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BRKY.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XMU.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BRKY.NEO vs. XMU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BRKY.NEO
XMU.TO
BRKY.NEO vs. XMU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BRKY.NEO | XMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | -0.48 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | -0.56 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.92 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | -0.70 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -1.54 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BRKY.NEO | XMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.67 | -0.48 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.97 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between BRKY.NEO and XMU.TO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BRKY.NEO vs. XMU.TO - Dividend Comparison
BRKY.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, more than XMU.TO's 1.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKY.NEO Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF | 6.90% | 5.58% | 10.93% | 5.40% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMU.TO iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.33% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 1.59% | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.51% | 1.73% | 1.35% |
Drawdowns
BRKY.NEO vs. XMU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BRKY.NEO drawdown since its inception was -17.36%, smaller than the maximum XMU.TO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRKY.NEO and XMU.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BRKY.NEO | XMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -27.31% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.36% | -9.30% | -8.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.05% | -7.66% | -7.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -3.40% | -1.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.91% | 4.25% | +6.66% |
Volatility
BRKY.NEO vs. XMU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Berkshire Hathaway Yield Shares Purpose ETF (BRKY.NEO) has a higher volatility of 5.05% compared to iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (XMU.TO) at 3.08%. This indicates that BRKY.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BRKY.NEO | XMU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 3.08% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 7.24% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.66% | 12.50% | +8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 11.23% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 14.00% | +4.01% |