PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

BRIP.L is traded in GBP, while XDWM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDWM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BRIP.L achieves a 5.03% return, which is significantly lower than XDWM.L's 12.82% return.


BRIP.L

1D
1.60%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
5.03%
6M
6.78%
1Y
22.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDWM.L

1D
3.22%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
12.82%
6M
19.16%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
9.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

BRIP.L has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWM.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BRIP.L
BRIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BRIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWM.L
XDWM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BRIP.LXDWM.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

1.65

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

2.23

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.10

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.85

9.05

-2.20

BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BRIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the XDWM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BRIP.L and XDWM.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BRIP.LXDWM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.65

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.44

0.86

+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between BRIP.L and XDWM.L is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BRIP.L nor XDWM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BRIP.L drawdown since its inception was -10.38%, smaller than the maximum XDWM.L drawdown of -29.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BRIP.L and XDWM.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BRIP.LXDWM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-37.37%

+26.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-15.35%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-7.14%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-7.35%

+5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.76%

-0.60%

Volatility

BRIP.L vs. XDWM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X European Infrastructure Development UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (BRIP.L) is 7.48%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Materials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWM.L) has a volatility of 9.72%. This indicates that BRIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BRIP.LXDWM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

9.72%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.08%

14.76%

-3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

18.44%

-2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

17.04%

-2.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.67%

21.53%

-6.86%