PortfoliosLab logo
BOIL vs. GDX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BOIL and GDX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

BOIL vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-99.99%
1.75%
BOIL
GDX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BOIL:

-0.13

GDX:

1.32

Sortino Ratio

BOIL:

0.66

GDX:

2.00

Omega Ratio

BOIL:

1.07

GDX:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

BOIL:

-0.09

GDX:

1.11

Martin Ratio

BOIL:

-0.19

GDX:

5.28

Ulcer Index

BOIL:

49.53%

GDX:

9.32%

Daily Std Dev

BOIL:

108.12%

GDX:

33.82%

Max Drawdown

BOIL:

-100.00%

GDX:

-80.57%

Current Drawdown

BOIL:

-99.99%

GDX:

-14.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOIL achieves a 24.61% return, which is significantly lower than GDX's 48.54% return. Over the past 10 years, BOIL has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of -56.12%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.64% annualized return.


BOIL

YTD

24.61%

1M

-0.22%

6M

93.06%

1Y

-14.28%

5Y*

-57.06%

10Y*

-56.12%

GDX

YTD

48.54%

1M

11.96%

6M

30.60%

1Y

44.12%

5Y*

9.12%

10Y*

10.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BOIL vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOIL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than GDX's 0.53% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BOIL vs. GDX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOIL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BOIL is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BOIL is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BOIL is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BOIL is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BOIL is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BOIL is 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GDX is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GDX is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GDX is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GDX is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GDX is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GDX is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BOIL vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BOIL Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOIL and GDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.13
1.32
BOIL
GDX

Dividends

BOIL vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

BOIL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDX
VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF
0.80%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.65%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%0.66%

Drawdowns

BOIL vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOIL drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOIL and GDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-99.99%
-9.55%
BOIL
GDX

Volatility

BOIL vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a higher volatility of 29.36% compared to VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 12.53%. This indicates that BOIL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
29.36%
12.53%
BOIL
GDX