BND vs. SCHZ
BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) and SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds - BND tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index while SCHZ tracks the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BND returned 1.60%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for SCHZ. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
BND vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BND having a 0.65% return and SCHZ slightly lower at 0.64%. Over the past 10 years, BND has outperformed SCHZ with an annualized return of 1.60%, while SCHZ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.
BND
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
SCHZ
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
BND vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.65% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.64% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 8.65% | -0.26% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BND and SCHZ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2011 | 0.93 |
The correlation between BND and SCHZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BND vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank
BND
SCHZ
BND vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BND | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.78 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 5.17 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BND vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHZ drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and SCHZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BND | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.58% | -18.74% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -2.70% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.92% | -6.18% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -18.01% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.58% | -18.74% | +0.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -2.13% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -3.68% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.93% | 0.00% |
Volatility
BND vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.14%, while Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BND | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 1.22% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 2.78% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 3.75% | -0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 6.09% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.53% | 5.42% | +0.11% |
BND vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BND and SCHZ have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BND vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than SCHZ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.95% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, BND and SCHZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHZ has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to BND (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs SCHZ's -18.74%.
On 10-year performance, BND leads with 1.60% vs 1.52% for SCHZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BND has performed better with a 1.60% return vs 1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND and SCHZ have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
SCHZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 3.95% for BND.
BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab.
SCHZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BND and SCHZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer