PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BMAX.TO
Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF
-2.51%17.88%19.42%11.56%6.10%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
0.84%18.03%22.28%18.36%5.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAX.TO achieves a -2.51% return, which is significantly lower than TGRO.TO's 0.84% return.


BMAX.TO

1D
1.60%
1M
-6.63%
YTD
-2.51%
6M
0.67%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
14.86%
5Y*
10Y*

TGRO.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
0.84%
6M
3.05%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAX.TO has a 2.62% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRO.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMAX.TO
BMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) and TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMAX.TOTGRO.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

1.37

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.29

1.89

-0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.80

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.41

8.08

-2.67

BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAX.TO and TGRO.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMAX.TOTGRO.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

1.37

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

0.12

+1.04

Correlation

The correlation between BMAX.TO and TGRO.TO is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Dividend Comparison

BMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.43%, more than TGRO.TO's 1.97% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BMAX.TO
Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF
9.43%9.70%9.64%9.55%2.41%0.00%0.00%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
1.97%2.03%2.04%2.17%2.46%1.58%0.83%

Drawdowns

BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -15.42%, smaller than the maximum TGRO.TO drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAX.TO and TGRO.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMAX.TOTGRO.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.42%

-18.37%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.30%

-10.35%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.89%

-3.78%

-4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-3.54%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.30%

+0.29%

Volatility

BMAX.TO vs. TGRO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brompton Enhanced Multi-Asset Income ETF (BMAX.TO) is 4.71%, while TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that BMAX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGRO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMAX.TOTGRO.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

5.01%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

8.13%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

13.72%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.14%

11.64%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.14%

768.01%

-754.87%