PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLBD vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BLBD vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLBD achieves a 53.09% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 17.39% return. Over the past 10 years, BLBD has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 20.74%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.25% annualized return.


BLBD

1D
-0.66%
1M
13.50%
YTD
53.09%
6M
41.33%
1Y
84.35%
3Y*
41.98%
5Y*
21.79%
10Y*
20.74%

NVDA

1D
1.94%
1M
11.41%
YTD
17.39%
6M
19.38%
1Y
54.29%
3Y*
77.51%
5Y*
65.68%
10Y*
69.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLBD vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BLBD
Blue Bird Corporation
53.09%21.67%43.29%151.73%-31.52%-14.35%-20.33%26.00%-8.59%28.80%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
17.39%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BLBD and NVDA is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLBD:

$2.34B

NVDA:

$5.33T

EPS

BLBD:

$4.07

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

BLBD:

17.66

NVDA:

33.51

PEG Ratio

BLBD:

0.17

NVDA:

0.18

PS Ratio

BLBD:

1.57

NVDA:

21.10

PB Ratio

BLBD:

7.86

NVDA:

27.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLBD:

$1.49B

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLBD:

$314.22M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

BLBD:

$181.06M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLBD vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLBD
BLBD Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BLBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLBD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BLBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLBD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLBD vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLBDNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.70

+0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

6.62

+1.54

BLBD vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLBD Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLBD and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLBDNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.60

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

1.28

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

1.40

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.63

-0.25

Drawdowns

BLBD vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLBD drawdown since its inception was -74.16%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLBD and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLBDNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.16%

-89.72%

+15.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.45%

-20.21%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-36.88%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.24%

-66.34%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.16%

-66.34%

-7.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-7.14%

+6.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.62%

-36.20%

+15.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

8.23%

+2.15%

Volatility

BLBD vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Blue Bird Corporation (BLBD) has a higher volatility of 17.57% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.53%. This indicates that BLBD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLBDNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.57%

12.53%

+5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.12%

25.59%

+5.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.57%

34.16%

+8.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.71%

51.67%

+5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.27%

49.80%

+1.47%

Dividends

BLBD vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

BLBD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLBD
Blue Bird Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

BLBD vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Bird Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
352.64M
81.62B
(BLBD) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BLBD vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Blue Bird Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
20.0%
74.9%
Portfolio components
BLBD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a gross profit of 70.65M and revenue of 352.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

BLBD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported an operating income of 39.12M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

BLBD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blue Bird Corporation reported a net income of 29.30M and revenue of 352.64M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLBD and NVDA have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLBD has higher volatility (17.57%) compared to NVDA (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLBD dropped -74.16% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

BLBD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLBD and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer