BKNG vs. CAT

In the year-to-date period, BKNG achieves a -2.42% return, which is significantly higher than CAT's -14.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BKNG has underperformed CAT with an annualized return of 14.68%, while CAT has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BKNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the CAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKNG and CAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than CAT's 1.84% yield.

The maximum BKNG drawdown since its inception was -99.32%, which is greater than CAT's maximum drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKNG and CAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) is 14.93%, while Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a volatility of 17.12%. This indicates that BKNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Booking Holdings Inc. and Caterpillar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.