BJUL vs. SCHG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BJUL is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BJUL returned 11.47%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

BJUL vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BJUL achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return.

BJUL

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 18.15%
• 3Y*: 16.15%
• 5Y*: 11.47%
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BJUL vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	6.42%	13.93%	18.41%	21.73%	-7.38%	10.77%	9.05%	17.81%	-9.06%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-14.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BJUL and SCHG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018	0.88

The correlation between BJUL and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BJUL vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BJUL	SCHG
Technology	38.4%	46.7%
Financial Services	11.0%	6.6%
Communication Services	10.8%	15.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	12.4%
Healthcare	8.4%	8.4%
Industrials	7.9%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	1.6%
Energy	3.2%	0.7%
Utilities	2.1%	0.4%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.3%

Return for Risk

BJUL vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BJUL

BJUL Risk / Return Rank: 84
BJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 87

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BJUL vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BJUL	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	1.11	+1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	1.56	+2.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.20	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	1.10	+2.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.62	3.58	+14.04

BJUL vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BJUL Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BJUL and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BJUL vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BJUL drawdown since its inception was -24.03%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BJUL and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BJUL	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.03%	-34.59%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.40%	-16.41%	+11.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.06%	-23.39%	+9.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.06%	-34.59%	+20.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-6.46%	+6.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-5.20%	+2.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.03%	5.02%	-3.99%

Volatility

BJUL vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) is 1.14%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that BJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BJUL	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	5.91%	-4.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.50%	12.52%	-7.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.30%	16.24%	-8.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.62%	22.38%	-10.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.60%	21.58%	-7.98%

BJUL vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

BJUL vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

BJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BJUL and SCHG in my portfolio?

BJUL and SCHG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BJUL or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to BJUL (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BJUL dropped -24.03% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, BJUL or SCHG?

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 13.27% vs 11.47% for BJUL. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BJUL has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BJUL or SCHG?

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 11.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BJUL or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BJUL or SCHG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for BJUL.

What is the main difference between BJUL and SCHG?

BJUL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. BJUL tracks S&P 500, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BJUL and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.