BETRW vs. GS
BETRW (Better Home & Finance Holding Company) and GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — BETRW in Mortgage Finance, GS in Capital Markets. Over the past 5 years, BETRW returned -33.40%/yr vs 25.80%/yr for GS. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BETRW vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETRW achieves a 66.82% return, which is significantly higher than GS's 25.51% return.
BETRW
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -32.04%
- YTD
- 66.82%
- 6M
- -51.71%
- 1Y
- 83.50%
- 3Y*
- 66.16%
- 5Y*
- -33.40%
- 10Y*
- —
GS
- 1D
- 4.96%
- 1M
- 19.43%
- YTD
- 25.51%
- 6M
- 31.67%
- 1Y
- 86.01%
- 3Y*
- 53.86%
- 5Y*
- 25.80%
- 10Y*
- 23.93%
BETRW vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETRW Better Home & Finance Holding Company | 66.82% | -8.33% | -25.00% | 966.67% | -98.05% | -39.37% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 25.51% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETRW and GS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
BETRW:
$3.01M
GS:
$336.52B
BETRW:
-$11.87
GS:
$57.41
BETRW:
0.01
GS:
3.10
BETRW:
0.35
GS:
2.74
BETRW:
$202.06M
GS:
$110.77B
BETRW:
$125.73M
GS:
$61.53B
BETRW:
-$110.34M
GS:
$24.94B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETRW vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
BETRW
GS
BETRW vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Better Home & Finance Holding Company (BETRW) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BETRW | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.49 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 4.45 | -3.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 14.93 | -13.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BETRW | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 3.13 | -2.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.93 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | 0.34 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
BETRW vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETRW drawdown since its inception was -99.53%, which is greater than GS's maximum drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETRW and GS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETRW | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.53% | -78.84% | -20.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.53% | -19.42% | -66.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.17% | -30.90% | -55.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.53% | -32.84% | -66.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.30% | 0.00% | -91.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.59% | -22.62% | -59.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.23% | 5.78% | +45.45% |
Volatility
BETRW vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
Better Home & Finance Holding Company (BETRW) has a higher volatility of 65.00% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 9.06%. This indicates that BETRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETRW | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 65.00% | 9.06% | +55.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 164.40% | 22.52% | +141.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 250.82% | 27.65% | +223.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 386.83% | 27.95% | +358.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 384.44% | 29.79% | +354.65% |
Dividends
BETRW vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
BETRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETRW Better Home & Finance Holding Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
Financials
BETRW vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Better Home & Finance Holding Company and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BETRW and GS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BETRW has higher volatility (65.00%) compared to GS (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETRW dropped -99.53% vs GS's -78.84%.
GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETRW and GS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer