BEN vs. WBA
BEN (Franklin Resources, Inc.) and WBA (Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.) are both stocks. BEN operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while WBA operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare). Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BEN vs. WBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BEN
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 30.35%
- YTD
- 45.25%
- 1Y
- 48.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.27%
WBA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $167.01M | $158.14M | $147.26M |
BEN vs. WBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 45.25% | 24.76% | -27.21% | 16.96% | -17.52% | 38.88% | 1.46% | -9.29% | -23.34% | 11.58% |
WBA Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. | 0.00% | 28.40% | -61.34% | -25.09% | -25.06% | 35.78% | -29.38% | -10.99% | -3.65% | -10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEN and WBA is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.35 |
The correlation between BEN and WBA shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BEN:
$9.32B
WBA:
$154.58B
BEN:
$6.31B
WBA:
$26.47B
BEN:
$1.69B
WBA:
-$2.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEN vs. WBA — Risk / Return Rank
BEN
WBA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BEN vs. WBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (WBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEN | WBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEN vs. WBA - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEN | WBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.81% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.70% | — | — |
Volatility
BEN vs. WBA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEN | WBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.07% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.94% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.84% | — | — |
Dividends
BEN vs. WBA - Dividend Comparison
BEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, while WBA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEN Franklin Resources, Inc. | 3.87% | 5.40% | 7.69% | 3.02% | 4.44% | 3.37% | 4.36% | 4.04% | 13.32% | 1.92% | 1.87% | 1.71% |
WBA Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.72% | 7.35% | 5.13% | 3.62% | 4.64% | 3.04% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.64% |
Financials
BEN vs. WBA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franklin Resources, Inc. and Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BEN and WBA have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BEN and WBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer